we have a new spoiler feature to hide any part of your reply that may disclose the correct solution
please, use the new icon above , it creates a button like this:


[spoiler]just enter any comments or suggestions that may give away the answer between the spoiler brackets [/spoiler]
please, do continue to offer your opinions about possible ways to interpret solutions .. we've had several already posted .. others have been suggested to me in Tells proposing alternative analysis using roll-outs and different GNUbg evaluation settings

reader's comments and suggestions are more than half the fun and educational value of this problem series .. my intent all along has been to complie sets of problems frequently missed by voters along with comments and observations by other fibsters, expert or not, regarding better ways to detect and avoid mistakes we all make, even the experts

keep on voting .. only one vote per reader is allowed and the results of a poll are only displayed after you have voted . answers will be provided in the form of GNUbg analysis TXT files attached to the original or subsequent posts

there is a thread discussing the evolution of this problem posting style and other suggestions at posting a position as a problem was a problem in our Feedback & Questions forum .. please contribute there with any suggestions or comments

if you have questions on posting a problem, please contact me or just give it a try .. we can always edit it later .. i'll soon have a post describing several ways to do it

a special thanks to webrunner for adding the spoiler feature


It's compassion that makes gods of us.
 -- Dorothy Gilman

I've been putting my comments inside the spoiler tag, but really that seems presumptuous as my partially-baked ideas [...]

My rule of thuimb is that if I think I might give something, anything, away that someone might wish they had thought of themselves before reading me say either that idea or something that readily leads to it, then I add a spoiler button.

Putting it a different way, a partially baked cake can still be gobbled down and found nutritious.

I'd rather annoy someone who thought I didn't need to have added a spoiler button than deprive someone of the satisfaction of the fruit of their own thinking.

My rule of thuimb is that if I think I might give something, anything, away that someone might wish they had thought of themselves before reading me say either that idea or something that readily leads to it, then I add a spoiler button.

That is pretty much how I use it - and I do like to see it used, because when you go to a problem to read and think about it, you can't help but start to take other's ideas on if they are in plain sight. 

With spoilers, I can make my decision, then read the others posts, contrary to what lewscannon would have you think   

Then I post my thoughts if I have anything different to offer - or something silly to say 

you can't help but start to take other's ideas on if they are in plain sight. 

This is very true. Even though we may consciously avoid looking at others' words and may keep our focus away, our eyes will still encompass the wider area and our brain will still parse the images and look for meaning.

It's a natural part of reading and you can sometimes notice the effect when reading a book. A novel idea comes to you as you read and then the author says it in, say, the next paragraph. You didn't necessarily originate the idea, and "oh, what a coincidence", you very possibly read it in advance subliminally.

Yep. No argument there.

The thing is, a reply that's down thread is not in plain sight unless you scroll down to it. I have no trouble ignoring posts that are not on the screen.

Yes, it is mostly the top couple of posts as I scroll to see the board or options...so the lower ones don't have to bother   

Maybe the ad's actually a good thing?  Who knew?  (c:

Probably your site adminstrator, stog.   

socksey



"They spend the first six days of each week sowing their wild oats, then they go to church on Sunday and pray for crop failure." - Bob Hope, on sailors