3) Direct Match against each other, if same number of wins

For this one, I might say, "3) In the case of a tie with 2 players, the winner will be determined by the match already played between the two. No final match will be played."

I like adamosad rules posted upper for 3)

**in case of 2 players :** If same number of wins, Direct Match against each other

**in case of more than 2 players ** sub-league ranking for that players only according to rules 1 and 2

*( => And then direct match between the 2 last top players if necessary)*4) Accumulated score of defeated players (for each player, sum the scores of the players he won against), if among three or more players, direct matches equal out (e.g. 1-1, or 2-2,...).

For this one, I might say, "4) In the case of a tie with multiple players, the direct matches already played against each other will count 3 point for win and 1 point for loss to determine the highest 2 players and then the league match already played between those 2 players will determine the league champion."

**In case we can distinguish players with rule 3 then use the rule 4**Rules 4) Accumulated score of defeated players (for each player, sum the scores of the players he won against), if among three or more players, direct matches equal out (e.g. 1-1, or 2-2,...).

This is completly different.

I mean with this rules that all equal players get points (points league standing) of each players he beat during the league. Then I compare all sum and define the ranking.

With a Example with 5 players

A line = Player Result vs A, vs B, vs C, vs D, vs E, Win, Loss, Points

A : - W L W W 3 1 10

B : L - W W L 2 2 8

C : W L - L W 2 2 8

D : L L W - W 2 2 8

E : L W L L - 1 3 5

*(I agree, normally I don't do the rules 4 in that case cause B win over the 2 others C & D, but it is just to explain the point describe upper)*Then B get 8pts for C and 8Pts for D = 16Pts

C get 10 pts for A and 5 Pts for E = 15Pts

D get 8 Pts for C and 5 Pts for E = 13 Pts

*(It's in the same spirit as swiss rules)*5) Direct Match of best 2-ply scores-players, if same accumulated score.

Rule 5 can be eliminated.

I must add that I like playoffs for players with same points, but that would be more time consuming and a bit more complicated than this method.

Rules 5 is always usefull in case we have to distinguish only 2 players in any case.

Is it more clear now for every body. Fell free to correct this add comments ;-)

But you can see now that the rules become complicate and players who look at the rules for the first time can be scared

So If I add this to my rules Page, I will certainly let the summarize rules and add a link for the complete