News:

**Inspired by recurrent discussions in FIBS shouts on issues concerning science and consciousness, we have introduced an ISP Board on Fibsboard.com ...a space set aside for more considered esoteric meanderings on ideas science and philosophy --- "concept formation and elucidation" .....> the philosophy/physiology/ structure and function of a fibster or fibsboarder!
take a look at http://www.fibsboard.com/ideas-science-and-philosophy/

Main Menu

Game 1, move 9: r_monk to move 3-1

Started by diane, August 01, 2010, 02:36:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

diane

Never give up on the things that make you smile

r_monk

9/6 3/2*
I think the only other option is 13/10 3/2* - hitting is necessary, hope I can keep you on the bar for a little while, so that I can break your prime by threatening the 3-point.
Think 9/6 will be better, I'm not sure about that. Keeping my blot on the outside seems safer to me.

ah_clem

#2
This is mainly supposed to be a learning exercise, so I hope our guest won't mind a little second guessing.

Is the hit correct here? My winning plan as White would be to let the blue runner sit and watch blue's board crunch, so I wouldn't hit.  As for what to play, I'd leave the checker on the midpoint so as to possibly hit an escapee and keep all my made points and that leaves 9/5 as the one remaining play.  One caveat is that this is a timing thing and I still suck at the timing thing.

Hitting does have the advantage of taking away half a roll that could be used to cover the blot in blue's homeboard, so it might well be right, but I'll still stick with the 9/5 play.  One thing is clear - if you're going to hit loose, use the 3 to bring a checker into range to cover the blot with 9/6.  Playing the three off the midpoint has to be inferior.

Since White is not close to a recube (yet) I see no harm in doing a rollout.  We'll see in about an hour.....stay tuned....

ah_clem

rollout

Spoiler

gnubg 0-ply likes the hit.  There's a non-hitting play within the margin of error, but it's not the non-hitting play I suggested.  I have no idea why 13/12 9/6 is better than 13/10 9/8  or why both are better than 9/5.  Ideas anyone?

Good job finding the best play among several close ones.



    1. Rollout          9/6 3/2*                     Eq.:  -0.275
       0.383 0.086 0.005 - 0.617 0.231 0.029 CL  -0.457 CF  -0.275
      [0.002 0.002 0.001 - 0.002 0.003 0.002 CL   0.006 CF   0.009]

    2. Rollout          13/12 9/6                    Eq.:  -0.282 ( -0.007)
       0.385 0.064 0.007 - 0.615 0.230 0.034 CL  -0.477 CF  -0.282
      [0.002 0.001 0.001 - 0.002 0.002 0.002 CL   0.006 CF   0.010]
       
    3. Rollout          13/10 9/8                    Eq.:  -0.294 ( -0.019)
       0.385 0.060 0.006 - 0.615 0.231 0.034 CL  -0.479 CF  -0.294
      [0.002 0.001 0.001 - 0.002 0.003 0.002 CL   0.006 CF   0.010]

    4. Rollout          13/10 3/2*                   Eq.:  -0.314 ( -0.039)
       0.372 0.081 0.007 - 0.628 0.232 0.032 CL  -0.487 CF  -0.314
      [0.002 0.001 0.001 - 0.002 0.003 0.002 CL   0.007 CF   0.010]

    5. Rollout          9/5                          Eq.:  -0.331 ( -0.056)
       0.370 0.062 0.006 - 0.630 0.232 0.033 CL  -0.517 CF  -0.331
      [0.002 0.001 0.002 - 0.002 0.002 0.002 CL   0.006 CF   0.010]
        Full cubeful rollout with var.redn.
        1296 games, Mersenne Twister dice gen. with seed 896490702 and quasi-random dice
        Play: 0-ply cubeful prune [expert]
        Cube: 0-ply cubeful prune [expert]

[close]