News:

**Inspired by recurrent discussions in FIBS shouts on issues concerning science and consciousness, we have introduced an ISP Board on Fibsboard.com ...a space set aside for more considered esoteric meanderings on ideas science and philosophy --- "concept formation and elucidation" .....> the philosophy/physiology/ structure and function of a fibster or fibsboarder!
take a look at http://www.fibsboard.com/ideas-science-and-philosophy/

Main Menu

Game 2, move 1 : Julia_H 3-3

Started by diane, June 19, 2012, 10:22:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

diane

ok..a lot happened after that 2-1...

Herd rolled 6-1 and reentered..then it was a straight race to catch up with very little difference between the moves..I therefore played the most obvious moves..and Julia won, with the Herd narrowly escaping being gammoned [only 1 pip off]

The match file is attached to date with all moves for analysis.

Herd won the opening roll in game 2, with a 3-1 to play..we made the 5 point  ;)

Never give up on the things that make you smile

Julia_H

You sure you don't want to let them vote on it?  :)

Anyway, lots of options with this one. Against a passive opening roll I'd go for two points in my board. However, the herd having their 5 means I need to be more cautious and think of an advanced anchor. Grabbing their 4 is undoubtedly good; their bar gives me no defence when hit and I may well have to leave fly shots to build my board. So, what point on my side do I want, 10, 8 or 3? 3 unstacks my heavy point but it can be stepped past more easily. 5 breaks a point that's already valuable, leaves a fly shot and doesn't really address that heavy point. 10 is a longer-term asset preparing to build a board. I suspect the way this will go is that the Herd have more incentive to run now that they can't easily prime or blitz me - which means an outfield hitting contest and so I want the extra home board point. 24/21(2) 6/3(2)

ah_clem

Match stats:

Nice job Julia!

                                             
                         Herd                 Julia_H
• Level of Play   Advanced (-0.0207)            World Champ. (-0.0042)
• Performance Rating     10.36                2.10
• Checker Play           Advanced (-0.0225)   World Champ. (-0.0022)
• Cube Play              World Champ(+0.0000) Advanced (-0.0203)
• Luck                   Very unlucky(-0.0354)Very Lucky (+0.0354)
• Total Errors (Blunders) 2 (1)               1
   Equity (Cost)        -0.269 (-2.17%)      -0.076 (-0.83%)
   Decisions            13                    18
• Checker Errors (Blunders) 2 (1)             None
   Equity (Cost)        -0.269 (-2.17%)      -0.035 (-0.52%)
   Unforced Moves       12                    16
• Doubles (Blunders)    None                  1
   Equity (Cost)                        -0.041 (-0.31%)
     - Wrong Doubles                         -0.041 (-0.31%)
     - Missed Doubles      
   Cube Decisions       None                  2
•  Take Decisions       1                     None
• Jokers                2                     1
   Luck (Cost)          -1.202 (-14.83%)      +1.202 (+14.83%)
   Rolls                17                    17