Here are the facts, as I understand them:
- The original dispute occurred during a scheduled match, don vs. donzaemon, when I noticed donzaemon had pipcounts toggled off. My request that he turn them on resulted in a lot of kibitzes and shouts;
- With no consultation zyxtcba told donzaemon to drop the match and banned me from Team-League play;
- souptree intervened and requested that I remain silent in shouts for a couple of days and I complied;
- The match was completed;
- souptree informed me that I was not allowed to shout anything controversial about Team-League;
- I informed souptree that I could not guarantee that I wouldn’t respond to flames on FIBS;
- I responded to flames from Team-League players and souptree banned me from Team-League play.
As far as pipcounts go, I don’t think I need to point out that some GUIs show them whether or not they are allowed on FIBS. There’s a reason FibsLeaGammon requires that the pipcount be toggled on.
I admit I was in no hurry to move with donzaemon after the dispute, and in fact started a new and frequently unnecessary pipcount after each move and after each kibitz or shout from what I consider to be the ratpack of FIBS.
The intervention of zyxtcba, self-titled GodMin of FIBS, was no surprise. There is history between me, zyxtcba, donzaemon, and those who were kibitzing and shouting at that time.
I had and have no clue if souptree’s fiat about my shout-ban for FIBS was a result of communication and deliberation of the Team-League Dispute Resolution Committee or not. If so, then it should be applied fairly to all players, not just me. If so, there should be some reasonable means by which a player could communicate with the DRC, or at least know how they arrived at their judgment. souptree told me NOT to attempt attempt any such communication.
In any event, I refuse to acknowledge any commandment from souptree or any DRC that says I must tolerate flames on FIBS. I ignore most of them, but reserve the right to respond to ALL of them.
With all that said, I welcome discussion, not flames, about this issue.
--
don