Poll
Question: 
WHITE, facing a backgame ahead 2-1 in a 5 pointer, tries to win the point with a bluff. WHITE to play. What is best?
WHITE, facing a backgame ahead 2-1 in a 5 pointer, tries to win the point with a bluff. WHITE to play. What is best?
Option 1: No double
Option 2: Double, take
Option 3: Double, pass
Title: Cube 109 - Cube against backgame?
Post by: sixty_something on January 31, 2008, 11:57:24 PM
Post by: sixty_something on January 31, 2008, 11:57:24 PM
If the board image does not appear in the question above, you may view it in the attached PNG file below.
one vote per user .. results of the poll are shown after you have voted
then, open the text file below for a copy of the GNUbg analysis or you may enter the ID's below into GNUbg or Snowie to evaluate your answer:
Position ID: BwAA8AEAAAAAAA Match ID: UomuABAAEAAA
Only the devil wishes everyone to be his friend.
-- Nicholas Venturella, Madison, Wisconsin, based folk-rock/garage/pop singer-songwriter
one vote per user .. results of the poll are shown after you have voted
then, open the text file below for a copy of the GNUbg analysis or you may enter the ID's below into GNUbg or Snowie to evaluate your answer:
Position ID: BwAA8AEAAAAAAA Match ID: UomuABAAEAAA
Only the devil wishes everyone to be his friend.
-- Nicholas Venturella, Madison, Wisconsin, based folk-rock/garage/pop singer-songwriter
Title: Re: Cube 109 - Cube against backgame?
Post by: playBunny on March 09, 2008, 11:09:33 PM
Post by: playBunny on March 09, 2008, 11:09:33 PM
Spoiler
If it's not clear, the clue's in calling it a bluff! ;)
[close]
Title: Re: Cube 109 - Cube against backgame?
Post by: spielberg on March 10, 2008, 12:57:23 AM
Post by: spielberg on March 10, 2008, 12:57:23 AM
Spoiler
This one's fun, not so much for the analysis, which is fairly obvious but for what it teaches about cube handling.
Needing 3 to win with a stong likelihood that when he does win it will be with a gammon, 60 is getting poor value from a cube here.
It's completely the opposite on Sarah's side of the table as she needs 4 points to win and if she hits a shot, or gets multi shots at an open blot, her recube will be perfectly valued.
Tho gnubg obv won't think much of a cube here I cant actually call it a bad cube as many weaker players would not recognise how efficient a take would be here and would be bluffed out of a point. The trouble is Sarah's hardly a weak player - and bluffs tend not to work on the Swiss anyway!
Needing 3 to win with a stong likelihood that when he does win it will be with a gammon, 60 is getting poor value from a cube here.
It's completely the opposite on Sarah's side of the table as she needs 4 points to win and if she hits a shot, or gets multi shots at an open blot, her recube will be perfectly valued.
Tho gnubg obv won't think much of a cube here I cant actually call it a bad cube as many weaker players would not recognise how efficient a take would be here and would be bluffed out of a point. The trouble is Sarah's hardly a weak player - and bluffs tend not to work on the Swiss anyway!
[close]
Title: Re: Cube 109 - Cube against backgame?
Post by: blitzxz on March 10, 2008, 04:30:40 AM
Post by: blitzxz on March 10, 2008, 04:30:40 AM
Spoiler
You can find some general guide in early cube action against different anchors from here. http://winningbackgammon.info/backgame-advanced-strategy
4-3 is a lot stronger then some might think.
4-3 is a lot stronger then some might think.
[close]