September 09, 2010, 06:49:21 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Check out the small but well formed 'Campaigns' board --we all feel strongly about something: alert us to a campaign, add a poll - be concise, and aware of strong editorial Wink

 
  Home   Forum   Chat links PLAY NOW! Help Search Calendar Login Register   **
Poll
Question: White on roll. Cube action
Double/Take - 4 (36.4%)
Double/Pass - 3 (27.3%)
Too good to double/Pass - 1 (9.1%)
Too good to double/Take - 0 (0%)
No double/Take - 3 (27.3%)
Total Voters: 11

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Position # 52  (Read 1506 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
PersianLord
Genes, memes and nothing else
Fibsboarder plus
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 399


It is better to be beautiful than to be good.


« on: January 25, 2009, 06:34:51 PM »

Position information:

Pip-count: Red 134-96 White
Score:      Red    0-0   White
Match:                5-pointer

White on roll. Proper cube decision?

« Last Edit: January 30, 2009, 12:08:41 AM by stog » Logged

The leftist's feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests.  - T.K
PersianLord
Genes, memes and nothing else
Fibsboarder plus
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 399


It is better to be beautiful than to be good.


« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2009, 06:45:05 PM »

(click to show/hide)
Logged

The leftist's feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests.  - T.K
FIBS Board backgammon forum
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2009, 06:45:05 PM »

 Logged
sixty_something
Pops
VIP Executive Donor 2010
Fibsboarder ++
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 652


facts? mere enemies of truth


WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2009, 12:01:24 AM »

what did GNUbg say about this position?
Logged

A little inaccuracy sometimes saves tons of explanation. -- Unknown
e-mail me
PersianLord
Genes, memes and nothing else
Fibsboarder plus
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 399


It is better to be beautiful than to be good.


« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2009, 08:01:46 AM »

what did GNUbg say about this position?

(click to show/hide)
Logged

The leftist's feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests.  - T.K
dorbel
Silver member
Fibsboarder ++
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 631



« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2009, 06:07:09 PM »

(click to show/hide)
Logged
PersianLord
Genes, memes and nothing else
Fibsboarder plus
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 399


It is better to be beautiful than to be good.


« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2009, 12:33:22 AM »

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
Logged

The leftist's feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests.  - T.K
blitzxz
Silver member
Fibsboarder plus
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 376


« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2009, 01:05:22 AM »

Now you can apply dorbel's rule. If you're sure that it's a double but not certain that it is too good, turn the cube. Sometimes you will lose a bit of equity when they correctly pass but you will put a point on the scoresheet. Occasionally however, they take and then your equity goes through the roof!

I disagree with this complitely. It's sure way to lose equity and the practical reasoning that you give opponent change to error is also wrong unless you know for sure that the opponent will make huge cube errors. If you continue to play too good position, you will very often end up in position that is double/pass or double/take and then of course you can give correctly the change for error without losing any equity yourself. In my opinion it pays lot more (in practice also) to double later in a position which is trickier or sometimes you just simply gammon the opponent.
Logged
dorbel
Silver member
Fibsboarder ++
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 631



« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2009, 09:31:22 AM »

Yes Blitz, I see your point. If you are fairly sure that it is too good then I agree you should back your judgment and go for the gammon. If you are not sure, as in this position for example, then turning the cube is a good practical option. The fact that you are not sure means it should be fairly close, so the amount of equity lost when it is technically too good and you get a pass should be fairly small. The occasional incorrect take should cover that. You don't need to know that your opponent is certain to make a blunder, only that there is a chance of it. Also, this is very important, the point that you gain when you cash a "slightly too good" position is a concrete point on the scoresheet. You don't have to use any skill to get it and it is there, written down. The equity from correctly playing on is for the moment only equity, theoretical and up for grabs. You have to play to get it and sometimes you have to exercise a lot of skill or it won't be worth what you think it is. In my opinion, in practical play, it is often worth paying a small price for a real gain as oposed to a theoretical one. Think of it as selling your house, the market value is $250,000, but a cash buyer offers you $235,000. You may prefer to have that in your hand rather than risking a fall in the market and not being able to get your theoretical price in the future.
As to giving your opponent the chance to make a mistake, of course you can only do this once. Picking your moment is a key skill. You say "If you continue to play a 'too good' position, you will very often end up in position that is double/pass or double/take and then of course you can give correctly the chance for error without losing any equity yourself." What you don't say is that you can also find yourself very suddenly not good enough to double at all! Thay can happen here on the very next roll for example. This isn't a too good position of course, but the reason for doubling now is partly that you will lose your market with a one and partly to avoid the horror sequence where you roll a big crashing double and are suddenly not able to double at all.

Sorry PL, I didn't save the Snowie analysis, but the approximate figures are in my text. Thanks for your kind words.
Logged
playBunny
Bunster-style
Fibsboarder plus
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 285


Fibsboard is great. You should try it.


« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2009, 12:53:46 PM »

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

GnuBg 4-ply analysis agrees with my thinking about the opponent's response to a cube: Wink
(click to show/hide)

Which is great - except that the 2-ply rollout tells me not to be such a fool! Cheesy
(click to show/hide)
Logged
PersianLord
Genes, memes and nothing else
Fibsboarder plus
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 399


It is better to be beautiful than to be good.


« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2009, 05:15:22 PM »

I agree with dorbel's rule, specially when playing against stronger opponents. When you offer a cube in a position in which taking is a slight error, there will be 2 scenarios:

1- The opponent passes: in this case, as dorbel said, you lose equity but not without any reward. You gain a score equal to the current cube value and that will add to your current score. As the old Persian saying advices us: "Serkeye naghd beh az halvaye nesye" ( The available vinegar is better than the promised sweetmeat ). We also should take into account the fact we're playing at FIBS with it's truely rigged dice  blush .

2- The opponent takes: in this case, you gain tremendously. Apart from equity gain, it's a known sterategical advise that if you're the weaker player, try to shorten the matches as far as possible.

But against weaker players, I would say playing on might prove more profitable.

Regards
Logged

The leftist's feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests.  - T.K
blitzxz
Silver member
Fibsboarder plus
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 376


« Reply #10 on: January 29, 2009, 10:44:12 AM »

In my opinion, in practical play, it is often worth paying a small price for a real gain as oposed to a theoretical one. Think of it as selling your house, the market value is $250,000, but a cash buyer offers you $235,000. You may prefer to have that in your hand rather than risking a fall in the market and not being able to get your theoretical price in the future.

My first rule is:

When gambling you should always maximaze the expected value no matter what the risk or volatility is otherwice you are simple giving chances (or money) away.

Of course I mean here practical equity not theoretical bot equity. (So you should cash marginal too good if all your moves are lot harder then opponents. However if you're better player you should especially play too goods to the end because it makes games longer and gives more chances to error for opponent.) But in general you take the risk away simple by playing over and over again and in the end the expected will become the real value no matter what the volatility or risk is. If you can't play over and over again or can't stand the risk it means you're playing too high stakes (like for your house).

In real life however you sometimes have to take too big one time risks so you want to minimaze it and end up paying the risk premium for some one else (like insurance company) who has the big bucks to play it over and over again and take the full expected value.

So sometimes too good will turn out to be not double at all. That happens. But the equity for the long run is still there and that's what you should always go for.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2009, 11:05:11 AM by blitzxz » Logged
dorbel
Silver member
Fibsboarder ++
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 631



« Reply #11 on: January 29, 2009, 05:45:10 PM »

Absolutely correct Blitz, if you KNOW that you are too good. My advice applies to situations where you think that you might be too good, but not certain.
Logged
lewscannon
Fibsboarder plus
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 303



« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2009, 07:43:07 PM »

I disagree with this complitely. It's sure way to lose equity and the practical reasoning that you give opponent change to error is also wrong unless you know for sure that the opponent will make huge cube errors. If you continue to play too good position, you will very often end up in position that is double/pass or double/take and then of course you can give correctly the change for error without losing any equity yourself. In my opinion it pays lot more (in practice also) to double later in a position which is trickier or sometimes you just simply gammon the opponent.

I'm with Dorbel on this argument in that in a close situation, give your opponent a chance to screw it up, of course depending on the quality of your opponent. I happen to think this is a double/take, but that's based on a hunch, as are a lot of my decisions of this kind. If I'm red, and white doesn't get out, I've got a good chance of getting 4 points out of this. If I'm white, I'm happy with the point if red declines the cube.

lews
Logged
blitzxz
Silver member
Fibsboarder plus
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 376


« Reply #13 on: January 30, 2009, 01:48:26 PM »

Absolutely correct Blitz, if you KNOW that you are too good. My advice applies to situations where you think that you might be too good, but not certain.

To my experience if you think you might be too good you're propably clearly too good already. Doubling when it is too good used to be one my most common errors and it's a common error for my opponents too so I wouldn't give such advice.
« Last Edit: January 30, 2009, 02:00:18 PM by blitzxz » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal 1.0 beta 5-1

Please Donate just a wee amount by clicking here or we will have to stick more bloody small ads here again...thx :) Fresh Air
Terms & Conditions | Privacy policy
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Sitemap Cornify Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.275 seconds with 37 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.025s, 3q)