Spoiler
Don't cube. We just have a 36% chance of hitting him and if we fail, he will cube us out and it'll be 2-2. A huge lead (2-0 in a 5-pointer) goes to air just because of our over-aggression.
Another point in favour of holding the cube might be the value of gammons. My bet is that we have a good chance of winning a gammon now (my guess: 8% to 15%). So if we hold the cube and hit, we will get the full value of our gammon chances as we'll get 2 points and make it into Crawford game. But if we throw the cube and hit, our gammons will NOT be as valuable because we'll get 4 points while we only need 3 points to win the match.
I haven't played money sessions so far, (I plan to play for money soon though), but I think this is one of the situations that White must beaver should Blue throw the cube. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Regards,
PL
Quote from: PersianLord on August 23, 2010, 12:15:44 PM
Spoiler
Another point in favour of holding the cube might be the value of gammons. My bet is that we have a good chance of winning a gammon now (my guess: 8% to 15%). So if we hold the cube and hit, we will get the full value of our gammon chances as we'll get 2 points and make it into Crawford game. But if we throw the cube and hit, our gammons will NOT be as valuable because we'll get 4 points while we only need 3 points to win the match.
Spoiler
That was pretty much my reason for being a no here...
Spoiler
If we roll a four, we win. That's 11 plus 3-1 for a total of 13 rolls that win outright.
5-4 5-5 and 5-6 also "win" (or at least get us to double pass). So that's 18 very good rolls for us.
5-1 5-2 5-3 and 4-1 give us about a 50% chance of winning. The other 10 rolls suck and the cube comes whipping back across the table.
The 13 rolls that hit give us a gammonish position, and we waste a point with the cube at 2. This and the recube vig lead me to think holding the cube is correct. With the cube in the center if we roll a 4, we're probably cruising to Crawford and if we roll one of the 10 bad rolls we're probably looking at being even at 2-2. If we cube here, we're risking going to Crawford in the other direction. The reward is not worth the risk.
Spoiler
It's not at all clear that if we roll a 4 "we win." We have by my count 4-5, 4-6, 5-5 and 5-6 that probably "win" for us, but the flip side is 4-3, where we then have 22 numbers to escape and the not so good 4-4.
Back in the day a fellow wrote a book on cube strategy and gave the sage advice to USE THE CUBE AS A WEAPON, NOT AS A GIFT.
So, is turning the cube punishing or gifting our opponent ? If I were on the receiving end I would grab the cube so fast it would never hit the table.
Seems to me we are in a position where we are a favorite to become the favorite with the 13 hitting rolls and the 4 non-hitting escaping rolls............oops, that's only 17 of 36. If we fan or roll 1-1, 1-2 or 1-6, 13 numbers, we're likely to get rewhipped.
As far as money play goes, if it's not a beaver, it's pretty close.
Bob
Quote from: NIHILIST on August 23, 2010, 02:58:10 PM
Spoiler
It's not at all clear that if we roll a 4 "we win." We have by my count 4-5, 4-6, 5-5 and 5-6 that probably "win" for us, but the flip side is 4-3, where we then have 22 numbers to escape and the not so good 4-4.
Back in the day a fellow wrote a book on cube strategy and gave the sage advice to USE THE CUBE AS A WEAPON, NOT AS A GIFT.
So, is turning the cube punishing or gifting our opponent ? If I were on the receiving end I would grab the cube so fast it would never hit the table.
Seems to me we are in a position where we are a favorite to become the favorite with the 13 hitting rolls and the 4 non-hitting escaping rolls............oops, that's only 17 of 36. If we fan or roll 1-1, 1-2 or 1-6, 13 numbers, we're likely to get rewhipped.
As far as money play goes, if it's not a beaver, it's pretty close.
Bob
Spoiler
Great we have you commenting again. I just wanted to add that even if we roll a 1-5, White should re-cube in my opinion.
Glory be to THEE!
PL
rollout
Spoiler
It probably doesn't surprise anybody that cubing is an error here.
I tried the position at various match scores and the cube decision is mostly independent of the match score. The exceptions are when he's two away - since he can't recube at two away it's correct for us to double. I've rolled out the cube decision at 1-3 match score below. It's also a double at 0-3 and 2-3.
It's not a double for money either. As for the beaver, gnubg didn't beaver at "grandmaster" evaluation so I'll assume that it's not a beaver, but I'm not sure how to coax beaver decision stats out of gnu.
cubeless rollout equity +0.415 (Money: +0.382)
0.646 0.009 0.000 - 0.354 0.014 0.000
Cubeful equities:
1. Double, take +0.310 ( -0.093)
2. Double, pass +1.000 ( +0.598)
3. No double +0.402
Proper cube action: No double, take
Rollout details:
Centered 1-cube:
0.639 0.110 0.001 - 0.361 0.006 0.000 CL +0.415 CF +0.402
[0.001 0.002 0.000 - 0.001 0.000 0.000 CL 0.003 CF 0.005]
Player r_monk owns 2-cube:
0.631 0.115 0.002 - 0.369 0.007 0.000 CL +0.958 CF +0.310
[0.001 0.002 0.001 - 0.001 0.000 0.000 CL 0.005 CF 0.008]
Full cubeful rollout with var.redn.
1296 games, Mersenne Twister dice gen. with seed 895296423 and quasi-random dice
Play: 0-ply cubeful prune [expert]
Cube: 0-ply cubeful prune [expert]
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Trailing 1 to 3
Cube analysis
cubeless rollout equity +0.365 (Money: +0.374)
Cubeful equities:
1. Double, take +0.716
2. Double, pass +1.000 ( +0.284)
3. No double +0.387 ( -0.329)
Proper cube action: Double, take
Rollout details:
Centered 1-cube:
0.640 0.107 0.000 - 0.360 0.014 0.000 CL +0.365 CF +0.387
[0.001 0.002 0.000 - 0.001 0.002 0.000 CL 0.002 CF 0.006]
Player saleeby owns 2-cube:
0.640 0.108 0.002 - 0.360 0.028 0.000 CL +0.716 CF +0.716
[0.001 0.002 0.001 - 0.001 0.003 0.000 CL 0.009 CF 0.009]
Full cubeful rollout with var.redn.
1296 games, Mersenne Twister dice gen. with seed 895296423 and quasi-random dice
Play: 0-ply cubeful prune [expert]
Cube: 0-ply cubeful prune [expert]