Hello

[audioslave]

Just a quick hello - I'm new to the borad & I'm trying out a logo

[webrunner]

Welcome to Fibsboard!    

[EddieVedd]

Welcome

Enjoy:)

[PortWine]

Audioslave rules.  Chris Cornell is one of my favorite lead vocalists and Rage Agains the Machine was one of my favorite bands.  Together = Audioslave.

You must be a man of fine tastes Audio.  Welcome.

PortWine

[diane]

Yup - another big rage fan here.  Whenever i hear them it reminds me of when i first heard em. A guy (who at that time i didnt know so well) presented me with a CD, saying 'i heard this and thought of you - I can just imagine you standing on a table throwing chairs around yelling F*ck you i wont do what you tell me'  Much better than flowers.    Worked too  

Audioslave do not disappoint either - but we have chatted about that - welcome  

And the avatar is great  

[EddieVedd]

The avatar reminds me of Chris ready to bust off the stage with SoundGarden. Perrrrrfect  :2drunk: We get on well Mr Cornell & I ! ...... Turn It Up !!!

[Shades]

Welcome audioslave..!!!  

[audioslave]

Thanks all!  You can check out my photo now too - just posted it!

[EddieVedd]

lol What were you in for ? Noise pollution i hope

[DelGato]

While there are probably a lot of people out there who would be quite content never to read another letter about Webrunner, the hysteria and witch-hunts fueled by Webrunner's invectives will blend together blackguardism and animalism in a train wreck of monumental proportions eventually. To get right down to it, Webrunner doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. It should be stressed that he has spent untold hours trying to make politically incorrect flibbertigibbets out to be something they're not. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that he has flirted with teetotalism and some of the more exotic forms of opportunism? To ask that question another way, why can't he live among us in peace? I'll tell you the answer in a moment. But first, let me just say that he is certainly up to something. I don't know exactly what, but the next time Webrunner decides to suppress all news that portrays him in a bad light, he should think to himself, cui bono? -- who benefits?

Webrunner has been offering the most catty bottom-feeders I've ever seen a lot of money to steal our birthrights. This is blood money, plain and simple. Anyone thinking of accepting it should realize that Webrunner says that separatism is the only alternative to clericalism. That's his unvarying story, and it's a lie: an extremely belligerent and bloodthirsty lie. Unfortunately, it's a lie that is accepted unquestioningly, uncritically, by Webrunner's understrappers. He has never gotten ahead because of his hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of his successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. When a political condition of greed, massive corruption, and diversity of objective is coupled to a social condition of drugs, violence, and discontent, therein exists the perfect environment for Webrunner to impose a particular curriculum, vision of history, and method of pedagogy on our school systems. If I said that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being thoroughly honest if I said that I, not being one of the many malodorous cutthroats of this world, really dislike Webrunner. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that Webrunner has been trying for some time to convince people that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality. Don't believe his hype! Webrunner has just been offering that line as a means to engulf the world in a dense miasma of absolutism. It's doubtlessly astounding that Webrunner has somehow found a way to work the words "anatomicochirurgical" and "physicophilosophical" into his self-fulfilling prophecies. However, you may find it even more astounding that he maintains that he acts in the public interest. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that he has a strategy. His strategy is to perpetrate acts of the most delusional character. Wherever you encounter that strategy, you are dealing with Webrunner. Obstructionism is the answer, but only if the question was, "What's the moral equivalent of letting Webrunner undermine the intellectual purpose of higher education?"

His deputies are not, technically, hotheaded fogeys, but rather lecherous goofballs. I, not being one of the many clumsy, iconoclastic peddlers of snake-oil remedies of this world, think that there is a small -- yet not entirely insignificant -- difference. His subliminal psywar campaigns do not represent progress. They represent insanity masquerading as progress.

Once one begins thinking about free speech, about execrable, unbridled misfits who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own sullen beliefs, one realizes that Webrunner's rank-and-file followers argue that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct. These are the same vindictive low-lifes who court a primitive minority of the worst classes of inarticulate hatemongers there are. This is no coincidence; Webrunner proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never invade every private corner and force every thought into a villainous mold. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks. I am familiar with Webrunner's goals, I understand how he operates, I have long recognized his tactics, and I know just about where Webrunner now stands on the ladder to total power. I can therefore say that, indubitably, he claims that anarchism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. Predictably, he cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist. Now that I've had time to think about his bons mots, my only question is this: Why? Why make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to his precepts? To rephrase that question, why do his cringers want to ingratiate themselves with him? He doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't foster mutual understanding. So what if he hates me for pointing out that he publicly disavows his ties to onanism while secretly encouraging his attendants to leave behind a wake of sniffish reaction? Let him hate me. I consider such hatred a mark of honor, a mark of distinction.

Maybe some day, Webrunner will finally stop trying to mold the mind of virtually every citizen -- young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated. Don't hold your breath, though. And if you think that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la, then you aren't thinking very clearly. Every time he utters or writes a statement that supports irrationalism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that he is beyond reproach. I maintain we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because his deeds are totally otiose, but primarily because if I had my druthers, he would never have had the opportunity to deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating. As it stands, the really interesting thing about all this is not that if a modern Dante were to update the Divine Comedy, he would have to create a special circle in Hell for insane reavers who inaugurate an era of unconscionable Bonapartism. The interesting thing is that while we do nothing, those who lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its commercial integrity are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we free people from the spell of hooliganism that he has cast over them. Webrunner presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, he devises new schemes to compromise the free and open nature of public discourse. His true goal is to draw unsuspecting swaggerers into the orbit of conceited fugitives. All the statements that his adulators make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to put an end to jackbooted anti-intellectualism.

Webrunner can fool some of the people all of the time. He can fool all of the people some of the time. But he can't fool all of the people all of the time. What's the difference between his hangers-on and yellow-bellied charlatans? If you answered "nothing", then go to the front of the class; you're absolutely right.

He harbors persistent and inappropriate anger. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper, because it's the news that just doesn't fit. Even as I write those words, I can feel Webrunner cringe. That's okay. Cringe. I don't care, because if we take his hatchet jobs to their logical conclusion, we see that quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "nondenominationalism", he will send children to die as martyrs for causes that he is unwilling to die for himself.

I can't predict the future, but I do know this: There's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I aver, there's a time to cast a gimlet eye on Webrunner's publicity stunts. Or, to put it less poetically, Webrunner can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors. Society has paid a dear price for letting him lower our standard of living, by which I mean that ever since he decided to brand me as superstitious, his consistent, unvarying line has been that his exegeses are all sweetness and light. Not only does Webrunner do away with intellectual honesty, but he then commands his subordinates, "Go, and do thou likewise." His catch-phrases are like hothouse plants. They shoot up, but they lack the strength to defy the years and withstand heavy storms. We have a right, an indisputable, inalienable, indefeasible, divine right to give our young people the values that will inspire them to uplift individuals and communities on a global scale to show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. The reason is simple: If you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. He provides none.

Plan to join Webrunner's camp? Be sure to check your conscience at the door. To say anything else would be a lie. We should not concern ourselves with Webrunner's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and the fact that if you were to try to tell Webrunner's helpers that he is a social liability, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that Webrunner's harangues have led to date rape, domestic violence, pornography, and other social ills. I could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. If we are to expose some of Webrunner's abysmal deeds, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the disruptive and patronizing ideologies that Webrunner promotes. Webrunner is an inspiration to insufferable megalomaniacs everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to divert our attention from serious issues and, more importantly, they don't realize that in a tacit concession of defeat, Webrunner is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what his overbearing sophistries have failed at. Believe you me, at no time in the past did audacious, illaudable pinheads shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them. I should note that if there's an untold story here, it's that a sophomoric mentality and a splenetic sense of Jacobinism create fertile soil for the worst kinds of sadistic witlings there are to produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. That's the sort of statement that some people feel is cocky, but which I believe is merely a statement of fact. And it's a statement that needs to be made, because the gloss that Webrunner's adherents put on Webrunner's memoirs unfortunately does little to call your attention to the problem of dour yobbos. The simple, regrettable truth is that Webrunner's announcements may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into pigheaded nepotism.

Let's all keep our fingers crossed that Webrunner doesn't leave a generation of people planted in the mud of a wrongheaded world, to begin a new life in the shadows of irreligionism. Let me quote to you from the words of my attorney: "Webrunner is doing the very thing for which he criticizes others." Although the Gospel According to Webrunner says that Webrunner is omnipotent, I suspect that his undertakings are a mere cavil, a mere scarecrow, one of the last shifts of a desperate and dying cause. Finally, any mistakes in this letter are strictly my fault. But if you find any factual error or have more updated information on the subject of Webrunner, Webrunner-inspired versions of racialism, etc., please tell me, so I can write an even stronger letter next time.

[wyzzz]

DelGato

Please never accuse me of verbosity......  


wyzzz  

[webrunner]

My pitty for you is great Delgato, or should i say zoeboy, or should i say Burper?

Do something usefull with your time man!

I am not even going to read this crap, and i think most people will just gaze through it, so you just broke the world record of wasting time ...  

[Zorba]

DelGato, yet another misunderstood script kiddie? :stupid2:

[adrian]

In my humble oppinion, what you are saying is insane Delgato.